Issues : Errors in EE
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
EE2 omits accents, which was corrected in EE3 (→EE4), by changing the signs in the 2nd half of the bar for vertical accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the wedge in EE2 is certainly a mistake. The wedge in the L.H. is most probably a revision of GE and EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In GE2 the accents were replaced with short marks, which were extended in GE3. All these and later changes (in subsequent GE,s) are a result of arbitrary interventions of the engravers or revisers. EE2 omits the accents, which is one of a numerous errors of this type present in this edition. The marks – in the form of short accents – were added in EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |