![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest an indication composed of the elements whose authenticity seems to be most plausible: category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
|||||||||
b. 4-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Both lack of the slur in bar 6 in AI and in bars 4-5 in FE (→GE1,EE) may be considered as inaccuracy of notation related to the transition to the new line (such situations are very frequent in Chopin's pieces, e.g., in the Etude in F major, No. 8, bars 34-36 and 61 or E category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The indications of AI were changed in the version prepared for print, certainly with the participation of Chopin. Therefore, in the main text we give the version of FE (→EE). However, some of its elements can raise certain doubts, particularly the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 16-18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The error of FE (→GE,EE) in bar 16 is undeniable:
In all the aforementioned bars AI has only accents, without additional indications. Cf. bars 20-22. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |