Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI the chord in bar 48 is provided neither with a staccato dot nor with the category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
We interpret the mark in FE as long accent. This is how it was also interpreted in EE, in which the accent was slightly moved in the direction of the part of the R.H., which, according to us, probably better reproduces Chopin's original notation. In GE1 the sign was interpreted as diminuendo hairpins, while in GE2 it was additionally extended, so it embraces the entire group of semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest to add a wedge after the authentic mark in analogous bar 4. The wedge was already added in GE and EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
in 
in the next bar. It can serve as an inspiration to the performer, yet it does not result from the notation of 
hairpin in 
