data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
In this case, the missing slur seems to be an inaccuracy of the notation of AI and FE (→EE2) – cf. the analogous slur in bars 34-35. The notation of bar 38 shows a number of possible potential inaccuracies of FE in the indications of dynamic nature (cf. the notes on the hairpins and the accent).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions
notation: Slurs