data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
The error of FE (→GE,EE) in bar 16 is undeniable:
-
appears in the editions in three strictly analogous bars 18, 20 and 22;
-
is rewritten already at the beginning of bar 16.
In all the aforementioned bars AI has only accents, without additional indications. Cf. bars 20-22.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, fz – f
notation: Verbal indications