mUltimate Chopin

Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 61-62

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

 

A slur added in FES
..

The line added in FES may be a slur, yet it is not certain. The sign may be a teaching hint rather than a suggestion of alternative phrasing. The traces of removing a longer slur (extending from the semiquaver f sharp1 to g1 in bar 62) in A  prove that Chopin's decision was a well-thought-out one. Therefore we do not take the entry of FES into consideration in our main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Corrections in A , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 62

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

A slur and a dot in A

A dot in GE (→FE→EE)
..

We give the markings of A. In GE (→FE→EE) only the dot was left, which is probably the result of inaccurate reading of the manuscript. The slur was probably added in A after the deletion of the sixth on the 3rd beat of the left hand, so there is no reason to omit it. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Accompaniment changes

b. 64

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

A slur in A (→GE→FE) and EE3

No slur in EE1
..

In FE, the printed slur is very faint, so it was omitted in EE1 and added again in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE inaccuracies