Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 19-27
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
Accents under e2 in bars 19 and 27 of A may definitely be recognized as long ones. In GE (→FE→EE) they were reproduced as ordinary short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The long accent of A was reproduced in GE as a short one. The absence of any sign in FE (→EE1) is probably an accidental omission. The (short) accent was restored in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 25-30
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The type of the accents over the four triplets in bars 25-26 and 29-30 is unclear in A. On the one hand, they are not much longer than some other, undoubtedly short, accents and therefore were read as short accents in GE (→FE→EE). On the other hand, they do not much differ from the long accents in analogous bars 17-18 & 21-22. In this situation we consider the uniform marking of all those places to be more likely. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The long accent of A, not very big but having a characteristic shape, was reproduced as a short one in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »