Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The unambiguous long accent in A was interpreted in FE (→GE) as short. However, the mark in EE may be regarded as long. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
According to us, it is highly unlikely that the wedges over d1, which are present only in A, were deleted in FE (→GE,EE) on purpose. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a possibility of considering them. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Wedges |
||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
According to us, lack of the hairpins in FE (→GE,EE) is probably a result of the engraver's negligence. However, it is not entirely clear, therefore we leave the inclusion of this mark to the performer's discretion. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The dot over the last octave is, according to us, Chopin's mistake in A (→FE→GE1) – cf. the analogous motif in bar 59. The dot was removed in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4). In AI there are no indications in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »