Issues : Annotations in teaching copies

b. 256

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

g2 in FE0 (→EE)

f2 in FE & GE

..

The version of FE0 (→EE) with g2 as the bottom note of the first of the pairs of the quavers is most probably erroneous. In the base text to FE and in FEG (→GE) Chopin changed this g2 to f2, yet in FE the correction was misunderstood, hence the flat was also copied, which resulted in a f2. Chopin corrected this new error in FEJ. In this situation, the presence of the original version in EE must be considered as a result of an oversight of proofreading or the engraver's inattention. In the main text we give the text written by Chopin's hand in FEG and FEJ.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FEJ , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 283-284

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

No indications in FE, #E & EE

Fingering indications written into FED

..

The signs written in FED under the 4th quaver in bar 283 and under the 2nd and 6th quavers in bar 284 most probably indicate a more convenient performance of the passage consisting in taking these notes over by the L.H. It is not entirely clear what it exactly is – according to us, they are additional quaver flags (cf. the Nocturne in C minor, Op. 27 No. 1, bar 27). We include these meaningful practical hints in the main text.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED