Pitch
b. 260
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The original version of last two chords, conveyed by FE0 (→FEG→GE1→GE2), was completed by Chopin with a2 notes in the proofreading of FE1 and in the base text to EE. In turn, in GE3 another addition was introduced, most probably modelled on the progression of chords in the previous bar. However, there are no reasons for possible recognition of this version as authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||
b. 268
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Enharmonic corrections , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||
b. 269
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The d1-e1 second, present in FE, is the original version – in FEG (→GE) Chopin added to it a g1. EE also features the completed version with the d1-e1-g1 chord. Therefore, the fact of leaving FE in the original version must be considered as Chopin's oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||
b. 273
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In FEG (→GE) Chopin enhanced the sound of the 1st crotchet by adding the E octave. In the bass FE and EE have only an e. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
Both source versions of the 4th quaver may be authentic, yet each of them may be erroneous:
According to us, there are a few more arguments for a single note in this place, yet they are not conclusive. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE |