Issues : Errors of A
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The sources lack in some necessary cautionary accidentals – the fully correct text is only in GE4 (→GE5). If we take into consideration the logic of the figuration's structure, all these situations may be considered as obvious oversights, in spite of the fact that in a few cases the harmonic relations would allow to consider the created chords as possible. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Before the top note on the 7th semiquaver, the returning f is only in GE4 (→GE5). It means the sound of f in AI and in the aforementioned GE, and f in the remaining sources. However, there is no doubt that the missing is Chopin's oversight, related to the correction on the 2nd semiquaver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||
b. 65-66
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In A (→FE→GE1,EE2) lack of the tie sustaining f1 may be Chopin's oversight. In AI the bars are marked as repetition of bars 4-5 (or 12-13), in which f1 is sustained. In A the repetition of the initial fragment of the Etude is written with visibly less concentration; moreover, the proofreading of FE was also less accurate in this fragment (cf. e.g. bars 67 and 69). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of A |