![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The accent in the 1st half of the bar may be interpreted as long or short in A. A clearly longer sign is written also in AI. On the other hand, a comparison with analogous accents in the 2nd half of this bar and in bars 1-2 suggests the second possibility and this is how the sign was understood in FE (→GE,EE). According to us, the context, particularly the harmonic one, can justify distinguishing this note with a longer accent. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The long accent over the d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The clear long accent, visible in A, was reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as short. See the note below. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
According to us, the accent written in A is to be interpreted as long. The sign in FE, despite that it recreates the notation of A quite accurately, due to the more constricted notation, is rather a short accent and this is how it was understood in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
It is the longest out of three evident long accents written in A in bars 21, 25 and 27. In FE (→GE1,EE) it was reproduced as three-semiquaver-long category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »