Issues : EE revisions
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The arrangement of the dim. indication in EE2 in bar 72 is certainly a mistake. In the subsequent EE, the erroneous indication was removed, yet in bar 71, instead of dim., sempre legato was arbitrarily added after bar 18. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Lack of the before the 6th semiquaver of the bottom voice in AI means that in both bars it is to be a c1. Knowing the final version, one can doubt whether Chopin simply forgot about the before this note. The use of A as the 5th semiquaver in the L.H. is, however, a strong argument for the authenticity of the literally interpreted version of AI. In A (→FE→EE2→EE3), there is no before the last note in the R.H., which is a patent inaccuracy of the notation. In GE1 (→GE1a), the sign was completed in bar 74, while in the remaining editions – in both bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The version of FE (→GE1) is most probably erroneous, which is confirmed by a handwritten correction in FES. The mistake was corrected also in EE and in the subsequent GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The fingering of EE was added by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |