mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 15-28
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-28
p. 3, b. 29-43
p. 4, b. 44-59
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text

  b. 25

No marking in A (→FE→GE,EE)

in FED

suggested by the editors

Chopin added  in FED. According to us, the annotation can be considered as an addition to the dynamic concept of this fragment written in A (→FE→GE,EE), therefore, independently from its possible change indicated in the same copy in bars 27-28.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FED

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4
Complete ➔