Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
Chopin changed the prescribed tempo of the Etude twice: in A he deleted Presto and wrote Vivace, while in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE), he slightly reduced the metronome tempo. Cf. changes of a similar nature in the Etudes in E major, No. 3 and C minor, No. 12. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Changes of tempo markings |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See Etude in C, No. 1, bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
According to us, an accidental omission of cresc. in FE (→GE,EE) is the most plausible explanation in this case. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
Chopin added in FED. According to us, the annotation can be considered as an addition to the dynamic concept of this fragment written in A (→FE→GE,EE), therefore, independently from its possible change indicated in the same copy in bars 27-28. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |