Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
The rhythm of A, interpreted literally, is unclear. Aligning the notes of the L.H. under the part of the R.H. suggests that Chopin thought of an analogous version to the version of bar 34 in this place. In the main text we adopt the version of FE (→EE3), as it is the latest authentic source, while the notation therein is faultless and unequivocal. The suggested variants include also different placement and number of accents in GE and EE4, most probably or certainly non-authentic. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
It is uncertain whether the accent in A should be interpreted as short, which is indicated by its size, or as long, same as two subsequent in this bar. We give preference to the 2nd interpretation. Omitting the mark in FE (→GE,EE) is almost certainly a mistake, as Chopin's deletion of an accent marking the beginning of a five-element progression seems to be totally unlikely. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
According to us, omission of the long accent at the beginning of the bar and the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
The slur embracing the progression of thirds in the L.H. was overlooked in FE (→GE). The mark was added in EE, probably in analogy to bar 44. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
in 
in 