Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In FE the type of the accent in bar 9 (short or long) is not obvious – in GE it was reproduced as short, in EE – as long. In FE (→GE,EE) the short accent in bar 10 was overlooked. In FED Chopin added a long accent in bar 9, confirming the printed sign. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
The missing pair of dynamic hairpins is probably a result of distraction of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In FE the dot extending G was omitted, as a result of which the bar in the L.H. has only 11 semiquavers. It is either a simple oversight (cf. bar 26) or a result of a misunderstanding at the time of proofreading (the wrong dot was removed? – see the adjacent remark). The mistake was corrected both in GE and in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
FE has e1 as the lower note of the 1st semiquaver. This rather obvious from the pianistic point of view error was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
FE overlooks the dots extending the octave in the L.H. This patent error is absent in both A and the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
in 