![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next »
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Extension of the marks in the editions stem from the engravers' inaccuracy and manners. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In A the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The accent of A is, according to us, a long accent and it concerns the peak fragment of the semiquaver passage performed by the R.H. In the editions it took a form of a common short accent, concerning the crotchet in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||
b. 50-51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The tie sustaining B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next »