mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 52-53

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

No fingering in A

Fingering in FE (→EE)

GE
..

The fingering given in the main text was added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→EE). Lack of one of the digits in GE is probably a result of an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 53

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Long accent in A & EE3 (→EE4)

Short accent in FE (→GE)

No mark in EE2
..

The accent visible in A should be, according to us, interpreted as a long one. The mark of FE is ambiguous, which we interpret in favour of a common short accent. This is how it was interpreted in GE. In turn, EE gives a long accent (except for EE2 which is devoid of the mark).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents