



b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The final version of the beginning of this bar is not entirely clear. A features a version with grace notes, yet written with a rhythmic error – the c
All accidentals added in GE and EE come from the revisers of these editions, while the
In the main text we add cautionary flats before a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The sources differ in the presence or absence of cautionary accidentals in the 1st half of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The accent of A is, according to us, a long accent and it concerns the peak fragment of the semiquaver passage performed by the R.H. In the editions it took a form of a common short accent, concerning the crotchet in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
We interpret two accents visible in A as long ones, as they do not differ from the remaining ones on this page of the manuscript. In FE (→GE,EE) only the upper accent was reproduced (as a short one). Due to the fact that the completeness of Chopin's proofreading of FE is dubious, we base the main text entirely on A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |