Issues : Rhythmic errors
b. 4-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A d in bars 4 and 12 is a dotted minim. The mistake, corrected in FE (→GE,EE), probably stems from the original notation of the Etude in two-time longer rhythmic values. What is interesting is the fact that in bar 52 Chopin noticed and corrected this mistake while still writing A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the first chord in the L.H. is a crotchet. The possible mistake (theoretically it could be considered as a simplified two-voice notation) was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 41-43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In bars 41 and 43 A has the original version of the rhythm, corrected by Chopin in FE (→GE,EE). Moreover, in bar 41 the notation of A is erroneous, as there are no dots next to the crotchet on the 2nd quaver in the bar extending its value. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Despite the fact that the correct text is actually undeniable, its correct notation in the sources appears only in GE3 (→GE4→GE5). The notation of A is unclear in terms of division into voices (hands), which may have resulted in a rhythmic error of FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE2→EE3). In turn, at the time of adding minim stems in EE4, the G note was omitted. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Inaccuracies in A |