Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 81-82
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In GE the crescendo indication was divided into syllables, which in this edition was a routine procedure in the case when the range of the indication was indicated with the dashes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Chopin added the arpeggio while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). In GE the sign was also added before the chord in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Despite the fact that the correct text is actually undeniable, its correct notation in the sources appears only in GE3 (→GE4→GE5). The notation of A is unclear in terms of division into voices (hands), which may have resulted in a rhythmic error of FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE2→EE3). In turn, at the time of adding minim stems in EE4, the G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Inaccuracies in A |
note was omitted.