Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Lack of the natural raising c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the main text we give the articulation (slurs, without staccato sign) in the 1st half of the bar on the basis of FE, which was probably proofread by Chopin. The reason why the earlier start of the slur (from the 1st note) introduced in this edition was reproduced neither in GE nor in EE remains a mystery. An alternative suggestion with a shortened slur in the 2nd half of bar 23 refers to analogous slurs of FE in bars 24-25. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In FE (→GE,EE), omitting the wedge written over the 1st semiquaver in A may be a result of Chopin's proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
1 from the chord on the 3rd quaver in the bar in a proofreading of 
