data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
EE2 does not have the accent added in EE3 (→EE4) together with staccato dots under the quavers (probably by analogy with bar 15). In GE a short accent was applied and moved over the crotchet. In the main text we preserve the notation of A (→FE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Placement of markings , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the first chord in the L.H. is a crotchet. The possible mistake (theoretically it could be considered as a simplified two-voice notation) was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |
|||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the head of the note embraces the area of two notes, d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , GE revisions |