Issues : GE revisions
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The version of FE, when interpreted literally – d1-f1 as semibreves, including the upper one with a dot – is certainly erroneous. We assume, as it was interpreted in EE, that the notation determines the value of semibreve for the lower voice. This version could be considered to be a result of Chopin's proofreading, yet the engraver's error, who simply did not complete the work (a minim flag and a dot next to the lower note are missing), seems to be a more likely possibility. This is how this place was corrected in GE; we give this undoubtedly authentic version in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The fact that the added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4) does not correspond to Chopin's intention is revealed by the melodic analogy in bars 18 and 58, which in the authentic sources are also devoid of , and, additionally, by Chopin's fingering. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We add a cautionary before b. The addition was already performed in GE3 (→GE4), in which a before B in the 4th group of semiquavers was added. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 78
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Shortening the length of the f1-a1 third and reduction of the number of voices are unjustified arbitrary changes of the engraver or reviser of GE3 (→GE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
in GE Chopin's abbreviation rall. was replaced with its extended version rallent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |