Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We consider the lack of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of the ties sustaining the inner notes of the chord and the lower slur (a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The mark written in A under the first chord has a form of a typical long accent. Despite this fact, in the main text we suggest category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of the slur in FE (→GE1) is certainly a mistake. The slur was added in EE and subsequent GE,s. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
FE gives the '1' fingering digit under the 4th note. This patent error was overridden both in GE and EE. Chopin wrote a relevant correction also in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions |
in 
, wedge). Intentional renouncement of the indications in this place seems to be highly unlikely from the musical point of view.
1-g1) is probably a result of the engraver's distraction (cf. 
suggested by the editors
