Issues : EE revisions
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering digits written by Chopin in FED. Fontana added the same fingering in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
||||||||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In EE4 a mark was arbitrarily added under the figuration in the L.H. (in spite of the authentic dim.). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 19-24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In EE Fontana added the fingering repeated from analogous bars. In bars 19-23 it does not differ from the fingering foreseen by Chopin. In bar 24 Fontana adapted Chopin's fingering of the similar figure in bar 10 to different intervals. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The rhythmic value of the chord in FE – a minim – is probably erroneous, as in the 2nd half of the bar there is no relevant rest. The error was corrected both in EE (by adding a rest) and GE (by changing the minim to a semibreve). In the main text we give the latter, compliant with the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The fingering printed in FE is certainly authentic, however, it includes a patent error consisting in switching the digits. Chopin partially corrected this mistake by writing '3' in FED instead of '2' for the 2nd note in bar 25. In the main text we give the already fully corrected version of this fingering, already introduced in GE. Fontana, while checking and adding the fingering in EE, also corrected this error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |