Verbal indications
|
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
|||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Chopin probably overlooked category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Chopin most probably added the indication con forza in the last proofreading of FE (→EE), as it is neither in A nor in GE. The proofreading in bars 14-15 included a few elements – the slur and possibly also the wedge. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of dim. both in A and GE most probably means that Chopin added it in the last proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
marks. According to us, the way of their arrangement is a result of the already disappearing in Chopin's times convention of writing marks inside their scope of validity (and not at the beginning). This is how it was understood in 
in this bar – cf. analogous situations in bars 53 and 63. 
