data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The ending of the phrase in the R.H. (from the 2nd half of bar 27) constitutes a difficult editorial problem. Between the version of the editions and the version of A there are a few differences whose mutual relations are unclear and whose interpretation carries a lot of uncertainty:
- slurring – the shorter slur of A, probably replaced with the longer one in a proofreading of FE; the latter could have been inaccurately drawn or interpreted (end of the line!);
- rhythm – in the editions there is no tie sustaining d3, which is included in A; Chopin's proofing is a very likely possibility here, as in the accentuated chord a repetition of the melodic note seems to be more advantageous;
- pitch – the issue of Chopin's possible proofing changing f2 to g2 in the last chord seems to be unsolvable with the current state of the sources.
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Authentic corrections of FE, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs
Back to note