data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
in FE (→EE) instead of
in A is most probably a result of the engraver's error. In the entire Op. 10 a similar mistake was committed on a number of occasions (in the Etudes in A minor, No. 2, bar 12, E major, No. 3, bar 54, C
minor, No. 4, bars 1, 8, 16, 26, 54, E
minor, No. 6, bars 21 and 32). On the other hand, the origin of
in GE is unclear, although the presence of this mark in this place is possibly a mistake too.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions
notation: Verbal indications