![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Main-line changes
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The b3 note on the last semiquaver of CLI and EE could be easily considered as a mistake except for the fact that in analogous bar 53 the sources have the same text. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that in CLI we are dealing with the original version, while in EE with the editor's revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Main-line changes , Errors of CLI |
|||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI has d2, d1 and d as the 4th, 8th and 12th note respectively. It is the original version, probably changed by Chopin only during a proofreading of FE (a clear sign of deleting a note in print can be seen only where the d note is). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The b3 note on the last semiquaver in CLI is probably the original version of this place. The same note in EE may be a result of the editorial edition. However, in both cases errors cannot be entirely excluded. Cf. bar 5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Main-line changes , Errors of CLI |
|||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
According to us, e2 in CLI is rather the original version of this place than a simple oversight of a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Main-line changes |