Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In both known copies of EE2, the omitted accents were added by hand. They were also added in the later impressions of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accent sign in FE is clearly different than in bars 1-2. Most probably, according to Chopin's intentions, it was supposed to be a long accent. Both in GE and in EE it was rendered as a casual short accent. In GE4 (→GE5) the sign was omitted, which was probably a mistake. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accents in bars 38 and 40 in FE (→GE1) have a form suggesting the use of long accents by Chopin. In EE2 (→EE3) the signs were omitted. In the remaining editions common short accents were given. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
We give after FE, based on the manuscript and corrected by Chopin. In the remaining editions the sign was slightly shortened, while in EE2 it was omitted (cf. bars 71-78). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |