Pedalling
b. 1-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE1→GE2,→EE). In later GE the indications were omitted – presumably by mistake – in bars 9-10. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 12-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 27-37
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE,EE). (In GE3 the sign was mistakenly omitted in bars 29 and 31, while in EE2 in bar 34; the mistakes were corrected in the subsequent editions or impressions). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 38-50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text in bars 38-46 and 49-50 we give the pedalling based on the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE,EE). At the same time we correct a few clear defects, particularly:
The omissions and inaccuracies in bars 40, 43-44 and 46 were already corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the sign after FE. In the remaining editions it was placed a little bit later, which, after all, has no practical meaning. According to us, the atypical – compared to the remaining pedalling of the Etude – position of this sign does not have to be erroneous: perhaps in this way Chopin wanted to draw attention to the need of more cautious pedalling in relation to diminuendo. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |