Issues : GE revisions
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
We add cautionary before d1 and f1. The sign before f1 was already added in GE2 – and subsequent ones – and in EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Lack of the mark in EE2 is a part of a bigger mistake – in this edition all dynamic hairpins in bars 71-78 were omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 77-79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the sign visible in FE (→GE,EE) in bar 77. However, we do not include the sign in bar 79, most probably added by revisers of GE and EE3 (→EE4). Leaving the end of a piece without the pedal release mark is quite often in Chopin's pieces and can offer some performance suggestions, cf., e.g., Etudes No. 7-9 or Nocturnes, Op. 27. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
||||||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Apart from EE2 (→EE3), in which the fermata mark was undoubtedly overlooked, the notation of the remaining sources has the same meaning, yet in the case of FE, GE3 and EE4 the notation is certainly imprecise. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions |