mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : GE revisions

b. 75

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

..

We add cautionary  before d1 and f1. The sign before f1 was already added in GE2 – and subsequent ones – and in EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 76

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

No indication in CLI

in FE (→GE) & EE3 (→EE4)

in EE2
..

Lack of the  mark in EE2 is a part of a bigger mistake – in this edition all dynamic hairpins in bars 71-78 were omitted.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions

b. 77-79

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

No pedalling in CLI

 in FE (→EE2)

  in GE & EE3 (→EE4)
..

In the main text we give the  sign visible in FE (→GE,EE) in bar 77. However, we do not include the  sign in bar 79, most probably added by revisers of GE and EE3 (→EE4). Leaving the end of a piece without the pedal release mark is quite often in Chopin's pieces and can offer some performance suggestions, cf., e.g., Etudes No. 7-9 or Nocturnes, Op. 27.  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 79

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

Pause in CLI

Pause in FE

Pauses in GE1 (→GE2) & GE4 (→GE5)

No signs in EE2 (→EE3)

Pause in GE3 & EE4
..

Apart from EE2 (→EE3), in which the fermata mark was undoubtedly overlooked, the notation of the remaining sources has the same meaning, yet in the case of FE, GE3 and EE4 the notation is certainly imprecise.

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions