![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in EE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 67-76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering of FE (→GE) is certainly authentic. EE also includes it, yet in bar 74 the digit over the 5th semiquaver was omitted, probably inadvertently. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 69-70
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Five consecutive category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 71-78
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Four pairs of dynamic hairpins in FE (→GE) and EE3 (→EE4) are undoubtedly authentic. However, the reason they are missing in EE2 is not entirely clear, yet it seems plausible to assume that the engraver of EE worked in parts covering particular kinds of signs and, perhaps influenced by the lack of dynamic hairpins on the previous pages of the Etude, he omitted this stage also on this page. See also bars 69-70 and 76. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Lack of the accent, undoubtedly authentic, in EE is most probably a result of the engraver's distraction (cf. bars 71-78). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Lack of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »