Issues : Errors in EE
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and EE2 the returning d1 on the 4th beat of the bar was deleted, which is a patent error. In CLI there is a superfluous before g1 in this chord, which shows that Chopin did not include in the notation the previous alterations in this bar at all. Similarly in bar 12. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of CLI |
||||||||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
E in EE is most probably the engraver's mistake, yet lack of correction even in EE4 indicates a possible revision (by Fontana?). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In EE2 the before the chord in the R.H. on the 2nd beat of the bar is at the level of g2, which is a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The sources differ in the range of entries. Chopin's entries in Ap and FEcor do not show significant differences, in the main text we give the version of FEcor. In finished FE the hairpins in bar 33 were shortened, the version was reproduced in EE with insignificant displacements (except for EE2, where both signs were omitted). It is GE that displays the greatest differences in comparison with the base text: the hairpins in bar 33 actually correspond to authentic signs, yet the sign in bar 34 in GE1 (→GE2) was arbitrarily prolonged, which distorted its meaning, whereas in GE3 and subsequent ones – it was totally omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |