![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Accidentals in different octaves
b. 19-20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In none of the authentic sources the notation of the accidentals in the part of the R.H. is entirely correct in these bars – particularly in bar 19. However, the inaccuracies do not pose problems in establishing the correct text. Moreover, in all sources except for Ap the unnecessary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI |
||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the sources there are three enharmonically different forms of this chord. Two of them are inaccurately written: in CLI there are no flats lowering d to d category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Chopin's hesitations , Omission of current key accidentals , Accompaniment changes , Enharmonic corrections |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Ap is missing a category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors of A |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The semibreve in CLI is undoubtedly the original version. In the final version Chopin enriched the sound and made the rhythm more robust. In Ap category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Accompaniment changes |