mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Main-line changes

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 28

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

CLI version, interpretation

Ap & FE (→GE,EE) 
..

The different version of CLI is one of two examples of the melodic line's change in this Etude at the time of refining the piece. Ap has the final version, which was also written in the base text for FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes

b. 29

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

b1-b1-a1 in CLI

b1-a1-g1 in Ap, FEcor & GE

b1-a1()-g1 in FE (→EE)
..

This is the second of the places in which Chopin changed the melodic line of the Etude (cf. bar 28). The final version is present in Ap, it was also already written in the base text for FE.

In one of the last proofreadings of FE (→EE) a cautionary  was added before the 14th semiquaver a1. In this context the sign seems to be totally unnecessary.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes