Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In one of the later proofreadings of FE (→GE,EE) Chopin added the slur combining f and e (it is absent both in FEcor and Ap). Similarly in bars 4 and 39. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bar 4, the rhythm's corrections written in FEcor confirm that the crotchets in CLI and Ap is the original version, changed by Chopin in all three analogous places (also in bar 39). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 15-18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering written by Chopin in FEcor. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 15-17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the dynamic markings written in FEcor, in accordance with the visible in this Etude Chopin's tendency to indicate only general framework of dynamic details. However, the more precise indications of Ap may be, according to us, treated as their completion. In FE (→GE,EE) the dim. indication, written in FEcor in the middle of bar 17, was reproduced a little bit later, on the 3rd beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In FEcor Chopin changed the crotchets in the L.H., included also in CLI and Ap, to quavers separated with rests. It is one of a few changes of this kind; similarly in analogous bar 43. category imprint: Differences between sources |
cresc. & 
dim. in 
