mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : EE revisions

b. 28

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

We add cautionary naturals before the G-g octave. The addition was also made in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) and EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 29

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No slur in CLI, Ap & FE (→EE2→EE3)

Slur in GE & EE4
..

Chopin did not mark the ending of the slur in FE (→EE2→EE3), whose beginning he wrote himself in FEcor (→FE→GE,EE). We add the only possible addition in this situation, in accordance with the ending of the slur introduced in GE (and EE4).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 29

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Semibreve in CLI

Version in #Ao & FE (→GE,EE) 
..

The semibreve in CLI is undoubtedly the original version. In the final version Chopin enriched the sound and made the rhythm more robust. In Ap  before the lower note of the first octave is missing. In Ap and FE there is no  lowering e1 to e1 on the 2nd beat of the bar. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE. In GE3 and EE4 an unnecessary  before the 2nd e is also added.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Accompaniment changes

b. 30

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No marking in CLI & Ap

 in FEcor, GE3 (→GE4→GE5) & EE4

 &  in FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE2→EE3)
..

was written by Chopin in FEcor, yet only the revisers of GE3 (→GE4→GE5) and EE4 placed both parts of the indication in a more or less correct way. In FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE2→EE3)  seems to concern the 2nd semiquaver, whereas  – only the 4th one. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 30-32

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Two single slurs in CLI

Double & single slurs in Ap

FE (→EE2→EE3)

GE1 (→GE1a→GE2→GE3)

GE4 (→GE5) & EE4
..

In all sources there are slurs combining tritons with the following octaves (some of them or all). Two slurs in CLI are the only performance markings in this manuscript. In the authentic sources the double slurs do not appear next to all four pairs of two-note chords, however, there are reasons to think that it may be an inaccuracy of the notation. Therefore, in the main text we propose such homogeneous notation, already introduced in EE4 and GE4 (→GE5).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE