![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we do not consider the accents of Ap, as in the version prepared for printing Chopin avoided overloading the text of the Etude with detailed indications. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give long accents written by Chopin in FEcor. Both signs were clearly distorted in finished FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Three accents written in Ap in bar 32 are undoubtedly short, if considering their shape. However, their position gives raise to doubts – the signs certainly do not exclusively refer to the upper voice, therefore, they fall on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th beat of the bar, where they probably concern the entire chords. However, if they concern the chords, such a position suggests their extended function, which corresponds to the definition of long accents (cf. bars 45-46). In the main text we give one category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The sign in Ap may be, according to us, interpreted as an accent (short?) or category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The mark in Ap may be, according to us, interpreted as an accent (short or long?) or category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |