Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give a long accent on the basis of Ap and a handwritten Chopin's entry in FEcor. The engraver of FE (→GE,EE) totally misunderstood Chopin's sign, reproducing it as for the entire 2nd beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in analogous bars 3-4, we propose an alternative interpretation of the short sign, resembling an accent, visible in Ap at the end of bar 12. A similar problem appears also in bars 11, 38 and 39. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 13-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The pair of the signs in Ap may be considered as an addition to the dynamic markings in FE (→GE,EE) in bars 9-10 and 15. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 15-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The pair of hairpins in Ap constitutes a part of a broader set of dynamic markings, which we jointly discuss in the adjacent remark. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The undeniable long accent, written by Chopin in FEcor, was reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as hairpins. The sign in Ap, as many others in this manuscript, may be interpreted as a long accent or hairpins. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |