Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Chopin marked the last phase of crescendo both in FE, which we give in the main text, and in Ap. In the remaining sources it was the sign of FE that was reproduced, while in EE it was slightly shortened. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The range of the slur in the R.H., written by Chopin in FEcor, is unclear – the sign seems to be too long to be a slur embracing only two octaves, as it was recreated in FE (→GE,EE). Due to this fact, in the main text we give the unequivocal slur of Ap. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In FEcor, apart from the '1' digit over the last e2 in bar 25 and '2-5' for the g2-e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The fingering digit for the lower voice, despite having been written by Chopin in FEcor, does not appear in FE (→GE,EE). It is probably a result of the engraver's inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
in 
3 sixth at the beginning of bar 26, Chopin also wrote two '4' digits. The digits were not included in 
in 