EE2
Main text
CLI - Copy by Linowski
Ap - Presentation autograph
FE - French edition
FEcor - Chopin's FE proof
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - Second impression of [EE1]
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
compare
  b. 21-22

The sources display a number of inaccuracies in the notation of accidentals. However, they do not pose problems in establishing the correct text. Reminding signs appear as well, according to us, unnecessarily. We discuss the 2nd half of bar 22 in a separate entry due to the enharmonic difference in the notation of the 10th semiquaver. In the table below a list of differences in particular sources has been presented (presence or lack of a necessary sign is marked with ++ or ––; presence or lack of a reminding sign with + or –): 

  bar 21 bar 22
   c2  e2  f2  g2  e2  c2  e2
CLI –– –– –– ––
FEcor –– –– ++ ––
Ap,FE,EE2-3 ++ ++ ++ ++
GE1 ++ –– ++ ++
GE2-3 ++ + + ++ ++ ++ +
EE4 ++ ++ ++ ++ +
GE4-5 ++ + ++ ++ ++

 c2 concerns the lower voice on the 2nd beat of both bars, 
 e2 concerns respectively the 5th and 16th notes in bar 21 and the 5th note in bar 22.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, GE revisions, Cautionary accidentals, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Pitch

Go to the music

.