Pitch
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In A there are visible traces of deleting the original version of the 1st quaver in the L.H. It seems that its notation did not go beyond the staff, it could have been, e.g., the F-c fifth. category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The chord which opens the bar in A is written without the before the topmost note, which is an obvious oversight. Chopin resigned from this chord, while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). The traces of its deletion – along with the arpeggio – are clearly visible in the subsequent copies of FE. Cf. bar 13. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In A there are visible traces of deleting the G1 note. It is unclear whether it was supposed to be a part of the G1-G octave or to be autonomous, instead of G of the final version. category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Nothing indicates that three naturals raising B to B and b2(1) to b2(1), added in EE could be authentic. The reviser probably relied on bars 11-12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |