Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
A quaver flag was omitted in the 1st note in the R.H. in FE. This patent error was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||||||
|
b. 89-90
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The fingering in the L.H. was written by Chopin in A, yet in FE (→GE) it was inaccurately reproduced – lack of digits in the last group of semiquavers in bar 89 and at the beginning of bar 90 is probably accidental. On the other hand, Chopin completed the fingering in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE), by adding the digits '1' and '2' in the middle group in bar 89. As all authentic digits complement each other, we include them all in the main text. In EE Fontana developed Chopin's fingering drawn from FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The fingering of A is inaccurate, while in the L.H. it is certainly superfluous. In the main text we give the completed and corrected indications of FE (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||
|
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In GE and EE4 the authentic F-c-a triad was completed with f1. Chopin's possible proofreading of GE1 is highly unlikely, therefore the version with four notes in the L.H. was most probably performed by the reviser of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
raising c1 to c
