|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The omission of the fingering digit in FE (→GE,EE) is probably an accident. Cf. the note on the rhythmic error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Chopin added the staccato dot over the chord in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In GE the mark was added also over the quaver in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
A quaver flag was omitted in the 1st note in the R.H. in FE. This patent error was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||||||
|
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The fingering given in EE at the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar is certainly erroneous (most probably the engraver mistakenly repeated here the set of digits from the previous group of semiquavers). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||
|
b. 89-90
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The fingering in the L.H. was written by Chopin in A, yet in FE (→GE) it was inaccurately reproduced – lack of digits in the last group of semiquavers in bar 89 and at the beginning of bar 90 is probably accidental. On the other hand, Chopin completed the fingering in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE), by adding the digits '1' and '2' in the middle group in bar 89. As all authentic digits complement each other, we include them all in the main text. In EE Fontana developed Chopin's fingering drawn from FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
