![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 4-5
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The ornament-free version of FE (→EE) is probably earlier, although errors in the reading of [A1] cannot be ruled out completely (they may have resulted from e.g. corrections or deletions in the manuscript). As our main text we give the grace note with the arpeggio, on the basis of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1, a category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1 (→EE), the inner note of the chord erroneously has the value of a dotted whole note [semibreve]. This is doubtless the mistake of the engraver, who omitted the note stem (it is worth while noting that heads of minims and semibreves look the same in FE). In FE2, instead of adding the stem, the reviser removed the dot; that version, while definitely inauthentic, is nonetheless correct from the formal point of view and indistinguishable from Chopin's intended version when it is being played. In GE the note is a dotted minim, which definitely reflects the notation of both autographs. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
FE1 does not have a single accidental in this entire bar, which means that the diminished chord d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ , FE revisions |