Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of pedal marks in FE (→EE1) may be an omission of the engraver of FE1 or of Chopin himself in [A1]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The flats lowering d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||||||
|
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In FE1 (→EE), despite the transition to a new page, the slur in bar 62 is a continuation of the slur in bar 61. However, in FE2 the slurs are separated, which is certainly a mistake. GE has a continuous slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 63-66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we adopt the more precise indication of FE1 (→EE). The partially lacking dashes indicating the scope of crescendo in FE2 is certainly a result of the engraver's negligence. It is possible that their total absence in GE is also an error (cf. the remark concerning bars 55-58). According to us, both the earlier placement of crescendo in GE and the placement of the indication above the upper stave in FE (→EE) may have resulted from the lack of space between the staves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
before the 1st note of the passage, which is a patent error corrected in 
1-d
1-d
